Monday 12 November 2012

Skyfall...

Watched the much awaited movie. It was refreshing, bold, crisp and not the usual cliche. The threat displayed is very real and one can correlate to the current scenario. The fact that the previous 007 "ROGER MOORE" has acclaimed it to be the best bond movie till date. 


007 celebrates 50 years in service to the crown. And what a way to celebrate it. I was wondering why such a name was given to the movie. On seeing it I came to understand that it was 007s home. The place where he was made orphan. This movie also shows that 007 fails in his mission by winning it. The villain, Silva, played by Javier Bardem is a man who has nothing to loose and is all out to dish out his vengeance even though it means loosing his life in the game. Did 007 actually win? It makes us ponder. Sam Mendes, known for the movie "The Road to Peridition" has taken bond to a new height. To put it straight, the next dude who comes in has a formidable task of beating Skyfall. Now all bond movies will be bench marked against this. 

The title song is marvelous too, Skyfall by Adele composed by Thomas newman.

Verdict :- MUST WATCH, If you have IMAX near you, watch it there.

Thursday 8 November 2012

Happy birthday Voyager 1...


Think about the different pieces of consumer technology you own: probably a cell phone, a computer, maybe a watch, an e-reader, a few other things here and there. How old are they? For my gadgets the average age is, I'd say, about three years. Perhaps the figure ticks up a bit if you take into account your car, your microwave and toaster over, and a trusty stand-mixer (those things, people like to say, can last "forever").

But these things are all babies -- babies -- when compared with our two Voyager spacecraft, the first of which celebrates its 35th birthday today. (Confusingly, that Voyager, the first one, is Voyager 2. Voyager 1 lifted off 16 days later.) Last Monday Voyager 2 became NASA's longest-operating spacecraft of all time. Voyager 1, which has traveled a more direct route, is on the verge of becoming the first man-made object to ever leave the heliosphere, the bubble of solar winds coming from our sun.

What's so incredible is that in the intervening 35 years, the Voyager spacecraft have journeyed billions -- literally billions -- of miles (Voyager 1 is now 11 billion miles away from the sun and Voyager 2 trails about two billion miles behind), borne the extreme cold of outer space (mission managers recently turned off a heater on Voyager 1 in order to conserve energy, bringing its temperature below minus 110 degrees Farenheit), and still, miraculously (in a strictly scientific sense, of course), the little Voyagers continue to send data back to Earth every single day, updating us on the very outer edge of the heliosphere known as the heliosheath.

Earlier this year I had the opportunity to speak with Edward Stone, featured above, who has been working on the Voyager mission since the 1970s. I asked Stone what we could expect as Voyager 1 leaves the heliosphere, and what it felt like to see this mission reach that historic achievement.

It would be nice, fulfilling even, if at the edge of the heliosphere there were, well, an actual edge, a boundary between our bubble and the cosmos. But, it's probably not going to be so cut and dried. "The boundary," Stone postulates, "will not be an instantaneous thing. [Voyager] won't suddenly be outside." Rather, the exit will be turbulent, "a mix of inside and outside," and the work of Stone and the other Voyager scientists is trying to square the different data -- the particles and the magnetic field -- to try to understand what that transition from inside to outside looks like. That turbulent region may take several months to get through.

But even without a clean break in the offing, it's hard not to sit on the edge of your seat to wait for this moment -- this months-long moment -- to pass. "We're looking at our data every day -- we listen to these spacecraft every day, for a few hours every day -- to keep track of what's going on. ... It's very exciting from a scientific point of view, when you're seeing something that nobody's seen before."

So perhaps Voyager won't make its mark with a sudden, defining event that echoes across generations as a sort of before-and-after dividing line through human history, like the line separating the time when a human's voice had never traveled across a wire to an ear miles away -- and when it had -- or before a human foot had left its imprint on the moon, and when that print was there. But Stone is okay with that: "Well you know actually Voyager has had a lot of those moments as we flew by Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune. One after the other, we found something that we hadn't realized was there to be discovered."

With that, we wish a very happy birthday to both the Voyagers, and many, many more.

COURTESY :- http://www.theatlantic.com/video/archive/2012/08/nasas-voyager-35-years-later/261346/

Saturday 3 November 2012

Essence of being an Indian...


I met a Swedish national in Berlin while I was taking rest in the Press Centre during IFA 2007 trade show. He said he is a part-time technology journalist and part-time pastor. He did his higher studies in UK. “So…you are from India…are you a Hindi?” he asked, while having coffee with me.

“Hindi is our national language. You mean to ask am I a Hindu?”
“Yes – I mean religion…”
“Yes. I am a Hindu by birth”
“Do you have Christianity there?”
“Yes, of course. Christianity came to India, centuries before it reached
you in Europe” I said.
“Oh, really? Still you are a Hindu?” he asked again.
“Yes – why?” I was curious.
“Don’t tell me you worship monkeys and rats…” he said with a smile.
“As a matter of fact, yes, we do”
“You can’t be serious. You look like an educated person…”
“I am very serious and I worship monkey-god and an elephant-god…what’s that
to do with education?” I said.
“You must be joking….People were worshipping animals and trees during
pre-historic times…but todays educated people, no way!”
“In fact, we have a pantheon of many gods and we can worship god in any
forms…”

“Hey, come on….there is only one GOD” he said.
“Really? I am not sure about it…”
“There is only one GOD…a singular GOD…”
“Better say, you have the concept of a single god…that’s your belief…”
“Concept? Belief…I am telling you the truth…”
“Who said so…?”
“All religious scriptures and sacred books say so… Christianity and Judaism say there is only one God. Islam also says so…”
“Those are great religions…what they say must be true. I don’t know about it… I am not a scholar in Semitic religions or in Hinduism. So let’s don’t talk about the Holy books and religions…I am not capable to discuss it….But about GOD, I have a question.”
“Yes – of course…”

“Ok… you shouldn’t feel angry…I didn’t feel angry when you ridiculed my gods…My question is based on your opinion of single god concept…” I reminded him.
“Shoot”
“You say that there is only one god – single god, right?
“That’s right”
“Your single God claims that he is the only God, who demands you to should worship him failing which he would roast you in hell fire…”
“It is not fully correct…but continue…I am listening…”

“That means. You are following Monotheism – that is the belief in a single god. Monotheism insists that only a single God exists. Other gods are “false” or even demonic…”
“Yes- you can say that…”
“For me, it is difficult to accept…”

“Why?” “If a God says: “You will worship none but me, that you will associate none with me, and that none of you shall set up mortals as deities besides me. If you commit the foulest sin by worshiping any other Gods (other than me) or associating partner with me, I shall throw you in hell fire as a punishment for this sin.” – That’s what, in a nutshell, your GOD says right?”

“What’s wrong in saying that? You need to have faith in Him”
“Friend, isn’t this self-contradictory and dangerous?” “How come?”
“First, explain to me about the contradictions…Had there been really only one God, it would not have been possible for man to find another God to worship, right?”
“Hmm…”

“Had the God been confident that there is no other God except him, he should not have been jealous of another God, right?”
“Yes – but who is jealous here?”
“Think…If the GOD knew that there is no other God, he would have been confident that people will not find any another God to worship, right?”
“These are all mis-interpretations….that’s not just right…” his voice became bit feeble.
“Think without biased, without conditionings…think with clarity….”
- The behavioral pattern of any single GOD in such concepts suggests that he is not confident that he is the only God. He seems always to be suspicious that there may be other Gods and people may worship those Gods instead of him.
- So the insecure GOD warns man not to worship another God. It, of course, is not a real god’s message. Can’t you clearly see the insecurity and whims and fancy of a narrow-minded human being behind this message?
- Can any GOD be always feel threatened that a member of his followers’gang may slip out of his grip and start to worship another God (probably the real creator of the universe)? So he had to enforce strict law that if any one of his gang tries to desert Him, he should immediately be put to death for apostasy.
- How can any GOD be so insecure? The single insecure god theory converts the basic instinct to insecurity right from the childhood. The follower’s behaviour may be fostered by GOD’s violent teachings for establishing Himself as the sole proprietary God of the world.
- And one more thing – you say, your singular god does everything. If there is only one powerful god who controls everything, doesn’t that also mean he creates bad things and causes bad things to happen?
“Do these reflections make any sense? Should I believe such a story or such a GOD?”

“You are talking non-sense, ridiculous…” his face turned red.
“Sir, I told you – why do you feel angry and insecure when I talk about your concept of god? We are having a dialogue here…”
“Shouldn’t I defend my beliefs?” he asked angrily.
“Now you are saying those are just your beliefs…”
“Sorry…Truths…”
“You may. But why should a human try to protect GOD? Why should you feel so insecure if somebody criticizes your concept of God? Isn’t it insecurity?”
“You won’t feel hurt when somebody criticizes your beliefs? You people worship cows…even dogs…are you not ashamed of it…”
“Do I look hurt? But fanatic followers – even in Hinduism – will get angry and violent. I am not fanatic or fundamentalist…I am a humanist…”
“Ok…ok…so you say defending the GOD shows insecurity?”
“One may feel insecure when somebody questions his beliefs. If somebody questions truth, why should you feel insecure? Its truth after all…Should you defend the existence of sun? Your defending won’t change anything with sun…Don’t you think that fanatic god theory is the very root is insecurity
– that is why we see a lot of followers have aggression and blind faith. We can find the seed of the real insecurity when a GOD is not confident that he is the only God in the world (and not in the universe)….”

“Your god doesn’t ask you to fear Him”
“No…Never…There are two things. One -The concept or notion of a personal God, hiding behind the clouds of secrecy, telling us irrational stories through few men whom he sends as divine messengers’ time-to-time, demanding us to worship him or punish us, does not make any sense to me.”

“What’s the second thing?”
“Is God as silly autocratic emperor who wants others to respect him or fear him? Can God stoop to such a low level of narrow-minded like a jealous human being? Or is it those human beings created such God?”
“So you don’t fear GOD…”
“I am afraid, I don’t…”
- The Monotheistic God is jealous and wrathful. There is one God, and one correct method of worship. Those who deviate are heretics and may be punished, tortured or killed. In its exclusive devotion to the worship of one God, monotheism has inspired much ferocity and fanaticism….that’s how fear comes in.

- At the heart of monotheism is the sure conviction that only a single god
exists, a tendency to regard one’s own rituals and practices as the only
proper way to worship the one true god.
- When one starts with the presumption that one is absolutely and utterly
“right” and anyone thinking otherwise is just as completely “wrong”, it
does not promote the flexible thinking required to keep pace with the
rapidly fluctuating pace of modern civilized society.
-Monotheism “demands” a right/wrong, heaven/hell, black/white worldview.
-On the contrary, Polytheism is an open-ended and easy going approach to
religious beliefs and practices, a willingness to entertain the idea that
there are many gods and many ways to worship them. Many roads lead to the
mountain top. A person may choose any path.
- Polytheism accepts that there can be more than “one true way”. This
allows for more rational thinking when discussing things like belief system.
Hence, polytheism is more compatible with a naturalistic view of the
universe than monotheism.
“Ok…I understand your view points, though I don’t agree with you… But you
didn’t answer my question. What does your gods say about worshipping them
and fearing them?”
“Very simple. An Indian saint, Adi Shankara said: “Aakashat patitam toyam,
Yadha gachhati saagaram, Sarva deva namaskara: Keshavam prati gachhati!!”
“What- what’s that? Come again?”
“It is in Sanskrit. It means: Just as every rain drop that falls from the
sky flows into the Ocean, in the same way every prayer offered to any Deity
flows to the divine cosmic power (Kesava).”
“Oh…”
- “In short, you may worship or believe in any God. No problem…Even if you
don’t worship or don’t believe, still it is no problem….This message from
the GOD is so confident, so secure, secular and broad-minded. Because it
can only come from the true creator of the universe, if at all there is a
creator. And you are not asked to protect this GOD and resort to violence.”
“Ah..That’s why you don’t get angry?”
“Yes – You don’t have to spread the message of this God. You don’t have to
defend the God. If somebody says badly about this God, I don’t have to get
angry or fight for this God. A true Hindu believes that God protects us; we
don’t have to protect God. So a true Hindu cannot get hurt in the name of
God or religion….”
“So your religion is against single and personal god”
“Not like that… You can worship personal god or impersonal god…everything
is manifestation of the same cosmic divinity…so no problem…you have freedom
there too…You don’t have to market this God and convert others into his
fold and increase market share. That’s why I remain as Hindu. How can you
believe in concepts of any other insecure Gods?”
“OK, you made your point clear. But why do you worship monkeys, cows and
elephants?”
“An ancient scripture says: “Isavasyam idam sarvam” (Isopanisad)
…Everything animate or inanimate that is within the universe is Divine.
This entire manifest Universe is enveloped by the Divine, the cosmic
power….Hence you can see God in everything – the monkey, donkey, rat, and
elephant or even in protozoa….”
“That means you can worship anything in this universe?”
“Yes – Be it Sun or Moon, Be it Hanuman or Ganapathi – whoever you worship,
you are worshipping the cosmic power. My favourite God is Hanuman
(Monkey-God). My traditional village God is Narasimha (Lion-God)….”
“Don’t you feel awkward? Shameful?”
“Why should I? I am not ashamed or apologetic to admit it….Nobody forced me
to worship or believe in them. I had a choice there. I am in a democratic
country. Nobody told me that this God would roast me in the hell, if I
don’t worship it. I just love the stories of Hanuman and Narasimha. And I
am free to criticize or make fun of those stories….”
“But, the animal gods are not scientific… So ancient tribes considered
everything as GOD…There is no science in it…”
“On the contrary, there was scientific advancement among our
ancestors…While my ancestors were learning and teaching the secrets of life
and universe, the homo sapience of the West were still crawling in all
fours and living in the caves….”
- While my ancestors were calculating the exact distance to the minutest
details, between the earth and sun or teaching Vedic mathematics and
astronomy, the West was believing the earth is flat till a couple of
hundreds of years ago.
- Should I challenge my ancestors and convert my belief to the extent that
Coco Cola is better than natural honey?
No – I don’t need a certificate or empirical scientific proof approved by
any international scientific body to understand the presence of God in
monkeys and lions. At least monkeys are our ancestors and lions are the
kings in the forest. It is anyways better than worshiping an insecure GOD.
And I don’t expect monkey or lion to show any magic and miracle to prove
that they represent divine energy…
Every God -everything in the universe- is manifestation of the divine power.
And the Hindu scripture neither demands you to worship the GOD nor will a
Hindu be roasted in hell. Even if you don’t worship GOD, nothing can change
– because your karma decides your destiny- the God has little or no role in
it – The Gita too assures this.
- “I hope this answer to your question – why do I continue to be a Hindu? I
follow “THIS” Hinduism; hence I cannot be a fundamentalist or fanatic….”
“Hmm…Somewhat…but don’t say that you are right and I am wrong…”
- “I don’t. What’s more, let me admit – the entry level Hinduism has some
mal-practices and superstitions without any scientific base. (Read
up-to-date science. tomorrow this can change). Most of the people blindly
follow lot of tradition without understanding its true meanings or
relevance. Some of those practices are either unessential or irrelevant in
today’s life….”
“That’s true in all religions…”
- “In all other religions you can see the follower has learned everything
about his/her religion and can beautifully explain all aspects his/her
religion. An ordinary Hindu doesn’t know or learn about his religion. The
Gita is read by less than one percent of Hindu population. That’s the
problem with a Hindu….”
“You told me about worshipping trees…And why do Hindus worship trees?”
“Hinduism has always been an environmentally sensitive philosophy. It is a
totally green religion. Our ancestors were not very much interested in
automobiles, petroleum products and plastics. What pollutes the earth? What
causes cancer? A cow or an automobile?”
- God exists in everything. The trees are held in a special esteem in
Hinduism as they provide food, oxygen, shelter, etc. By associating
religion with plant kingdom, our ancient Indians tried to instil in us a
reverence for them, so that we may protect, preserve and cultivate these
beneficial plants in the future.
- Plant kingdom gives me everything I that I need – so what’s wrong in
worshiping it? Worshiping a tree is better than worshiping an imaginary
God, isn’t it?
“OK – but I have a genuine question now…If you don’t have a personal God,
how will you pray? What will you pray? What will you ask for?”
“Should we pray? What should I pray?” When we know that isavasyam idam
sarvam, what’s there to pray? I am part of GOD and the GOD is part of me. I
cannot exist without GOD and GOD cannot exist without me.
* Aham Brahmasmi (Brhadaranyaka Upanishad) = “I am Brahman” I am integral
part of cosmic energy.
* Tat Tvam Asi (Chandogya Upanishad) = “Thou art That” The identity of
individual self as a part of the whole which is ‘tat’, Brahman.
* Ayam Atma Brahma (Mandukya Upanishad) = “This Self (Atman) is Brahman”
* prajñānam brahma – “Consciousness is Brahman” (Aitareya Upanishad 3.3 of
the Rig Veda).
“As everything in the universe belong to me, what else I need? What would
anybody gain by a prayer? God has provided me everything I need (not what I
WANT)”
“That means you don’t need anything?”
“If I answer philosophically, I need something, only if it is lacking in
me. Nothing lacks in me. I don’t feel I am imperfect or anyways inferior to
anybody. Because, I am created by a perfect divinity. It just can’t go
wrong.”
- There is a divine assurance for this:”Om Poorna Madah Poorna Midam
Poornaat Poorna Mudachayate Poornasya Poorna Maadaaya Poorna Mevaa
Vashishyate” (That is perfect; this is perfect. What comes from such
Perfection truly is perfect. What remains after Perfection from Perfection
is yet again perfect)
- The cosmic created me just as it created you. So nobody can be imperfect.
At least accept this truth: “I am perfect with all my imperfections”
– I don’t have to pray for anything as the force behind creation has seen
to it so perfectly that everything is perfectly managed for me. For
instance, before I was born, the cosmic has in-stored my food as my
mother’s milk – who can take care of better than this? Everything is being
taken care, so meticulously – so what should I pray.
- Whatever I need will be given to me by the divine. Am I a fool to think
that even a grass can move without the cosmic knowledge? No, I don’t have
to remind the cosmic what I need. It knows better what I need. Any
situation in life appears with cosmic wisdom – who am I to question it or
challenge it or pray against such a situation?
“You mean to say you don’t have prayers?”
- “We do have…. my ancestors taught me three most important and
non-personalized prayers”

1.       “Asatoma Ma Sadgamaya tamaso ma jyotirgamaya mrtyorma amrtam gamaya Om
santhi, santhi santhihi” (Brhadaranyaka Upanishad).

Take us from darkness to light’; from ignorance to awareness; from incompleteness to totality.
Let there be peace everywhere. This is not a personal prayer.

2.       ”Loka samastha sukhino bhavanthu.”

May happiness be unto the entire
world. Not just me. I should not pray for any selfish gain, my ancestors
taught me. If your neighbor is starving and I am binging, where is the
happiness? The entire world should be happy.

3.       “Om Bhur Buvaha Suvaha Thath Savithur VarenyamBhargo Devasya Dheemahi
Dhiyo Yonaha Prachodayath” (Gayatri).
We contemplate the glory of Light illuminating the three worlds: gross, subtle, and causal. I am that vivifying power, love, radiant illumination, and divine grace of universal intelligence. We pray for the divine light to illumine our minds.